What will happen to me if I talk back to an NCO?

Talking back to an NCO can result in Article 91 charges for contempt or disrespect. Consequences range from nonjudicial punishment to court-martial, depending on severity. Maximum punishment for contempt toward an NCO includes a bad-conduct discharge and confinement.

How will I be punished if I talk back to an NCO?

Punishment depends on the NCO's rank and the nature of the conduct. Disrespect toward a warrant officer carries a bad-conduct discharge and up to 9 months confinement. Disrespect toward a superior NCO carries a BCD and 6 months. Disrespect toward another NCO carries no discharge and up to 3 months confinement.

Can I be kicked out of the military if I talk back to an NCO?

Yes. A conviction for contempt or disrespect toward a warrant officer or superior NCO can result in a bad-conduct discharge. Striking or assaulting an NCO can result in a dishonorable discharge. However, outcomes depend on the facts, the forum, and the strength of your defense.

Will I get put in the brig if I talk back to an NCO?

Confinement is possible. Disrespect toward a warrant officer carries up to 9 months. Disrespect toward a superior NCO carries up to 6 months. Disrespect toward another NCO carries up to 3 months. Striking an NCO carries significantly more — up to 5 years for a warrant officer.

Will I get in trouble if I talked bad about an NCO behind their back?

Article 91 requires that the contempt or disrespect occur in the presence of the warrant officer, NCO, or petty officer — within sight or hearing. Talking about an NCO behind their back generally does not meet this element, though other charges may apply depending on the conduct.

Will I get in trouble for disrespecting an NCO even if they started it?

The defense of divestiture does not apply to Article 91 — it only applies to superior commissioned officers under Article 89. However, if the NCO was not in the execution of office or the interaction was a personal dispute outside official duties, that can be a valid defense.

Does the NCO or warrant officer have to be acting officially?

Yes. The government must prove the warrant officer, NCO, or petty officer was in the execution of office at the time of the conduct. Off-duty interactions or personal disputes outside official duties may not satisfy this element.

What is the difference between Article 90 and Article 91?

Article 90 applies to willful disobedience of a lawful command from a superior commissioned officer. Article 91 applies to insubordinate conduct — striking, disobeying, or showing disrespect — toward a warrant officer, NCO, or petty officer. Article 90 carries harsher maximum punishments, including death in time of war.

What will happen to me if I talk back to an NCO?

Talking back to an NCO can lead to discipline or criminal charges depending on the situation. If the government claims your words, tone, or behavior were disrespectful and the NCO was acting in the execution of office, it may be charged under Article 91 of the UCMJ. Outcomes range from counseling or Article 15 to court-martial in more serious cases.

How will I be punished if I talk back to an NCO?

Punishment depends on how the command handles the incident and what can be proven. Some cases result in counseling or nonjudicial punishment. If charged under Article 91, UCMJ, punishment can include reduction in rank, forfeitures, restriction, extra duties, or confinement if prosecuted at court-martial.

Can I be kicked out of the military if I talk back to an NCO?

Yes. Even when a case is not resolved at court-martial, an allegation of disrespect or insubordination can trigger administrative separation proceedings. If prosecuted under Article 91, UCMJ at court-martial, a punitive discharge may also be authorized depending on the specific offense.

Will I get put in the brig if I talk back to an NCO?

It is possible, but not automatic. Confinement is only imposed if the case goes to court-martial and results in a conviction. Many Article 91 allegations are handled at a lower level, but some escalate quickly depending on the facts, witnesses, and command response.

Will I get in trouble if I talked bad about an NCO behind their back?

Generally, no. For disrespect to qualify as an Article 91 offense, the conduct must occur within the sight or hearing of the warrant officer, noncommissioned officer, or petty officer. Statements made behind an NCO’s back, such as private conversations or messages not communicated to the NCO, typically do not meet the legal requirements for an Article 91 charge, though they may still result in administrative discipline.

Will I get in trouble for disrespecting an NCO even if they started it?

You can still get in trouble. Provocation by an NCO is not a legal defense by itself. However, who started the confrontation, how it escalated, and the setting are critical facts that can affect whether the conduct legally qualifies as disrespect under Article 91 and how the case is ultimately handled.

Does the NCO or warrant officer have to be acting officially?

Yes. To convict under Article 91, UCMJ, the government generally must prove the warrant officer, NCO, or petty officer was acting in the execution of office at the time of the alleged misconduct. Personal disputes or off-duty situations often raise significant defense issues.

What is the difference between Article 90 and Article 91?

Article 90 of the UCMJ applies to disobeying or assaulting a commissioned officer. Article 91 applies to insubordinate conduct toward a warrant officer, noncommissioned officer, or petty officer.

ARTICLE 91 UCMJ Insubordinate Conduct Toward a Warrant Officer, NCO, or Petty Officer

WINNING ON THE FRONT LINES OF
MILITARY JUSTICE

GET A FREE CONSULTATION NOW

Article 91 of the UCMJ criminalizes insubordinate conduct toward warrant officers, NCOs, and petty officers. These cases often arise in stressful, fast-moving situations — field exercises, deployments, shipboard operations, or heated workplace encounters — where tone, context, and authority lines matter. Article 91 is distinct from Article 90 (commissioned officers) and Article 92 (general orders and regulations). These charges are frequently paired with Article 92 or Article 128, and can be overcharged based on emotion rather than evidence.

What Article 91 Covers

Article 91 includes three distinct categories of misconduct:

Striking or assaulting a warrant officer, NCO, or petty officer
Willfully disobeying a lawful order from a warrant officer, NCO, or petty officer
Treating with contempt or being disrespectful in language or behavior toward a warrant officer, NCO, or petty officer

Each category has different legal elements and defenses.

Elements the Government Must Prove

Striking or Assaulting a Warrant Officer, NCO, or Petty Officer

The government must prove:

The accused struck or assaulted the warrant officer, NCO, or petty officer
The victim was in the execution of office
The accused knew the victim’s status
The act was unlawful

Willful Disobedience of a Lawful Order

The government must prove:

A lawful order was issued
The order came from a warrant officer, NCO, or petty officer
The officer was in the execution of office
The accused knew the person’s status
The accused willfully disobeyed the order

Not every instruction is a lawful order. Authority, scope, and clarity matter.

Disrespect or Contempt Toward a Warrant Officer, NCO, or Petty Officer

The government must prove:

The accused used certain language or behavior
The conduct was disrespectful or contemptuous
The target was a warrant officer, NCO, or petty officer
The officer was in the execution of office
The accused knew the person’s status

Disrespect cases are highly fact-specific and frequently hinge on tone, setting, and witness credibility.

Common Defenses to Article 91 Charges

Article 91 cases are defense-friendly when properly analyzed. Common defenses include:

Not in the execution of office — the interaction occurred off-duty, during a personal dispute, or outside official duties
No lawful order — the order exceeded authority, was vague, or was unrelated to military duty
Lack of willfulness — the conduct resulted from misunderstanding, confusion, or inability to comply
Not in the presence of the WO, NCO, or PO — insubordination must occur within sight or hearing, unlike officer cases
Credibility and exaggeration — cases often charged based on rank alone rather than evidence

The special defense of divestiture does not apply to Article 91. Divestiture only applies to superior commissioned officers under Article 89.

Maximum Punishment Under Article 91

These are maximum authorized punishments. Actual punishment depends on the forum — special or general court-martial — and jurisdictional caps. For a full comparison across forums, see court-martial punishments and sentencing.

Striking or Assaulting

Warrant officer: Dishonorable discharge, 5 years confinement, total forfeiture of pay
Superior NCO or petty officer: Dishonorable discharge, 3 years confinement, total forfeiture of pay
Other NCO or petty officer: Dishonorable discharge, 1 year confinement, total forfeiture of pay

Willfully Disobeying a Lawful Order

Warrant officer: Dishonorable discharge, 2 years confinement, total forfeiture of pay
NCO or petty officer: Bad-conduct discharge, 1 year confinement, total forfeiture of pay

Contempt or Disrespect

Warrant officer: Bad-conduct discharge, 9 months confinement, total forfeiture of pay
Superior NCO or petty officer: Bad-conduct discharge, 6 months confinement, total forfeiture of pay
Other NCO or petty officer: No discharge authorized, 3 months confinement, 2/3 forfeiture of pay for 3 months

Recommended Confinement Sentence (MCM Appendices 12B , 12C, & 12D)

The Manual for Courts-Martial (MCM) assigns offense categories and recommended confinement ranges. These are non-mandatory — the sentencing authority may deviate only if justified, and the lesser maximum authorized punishment always controls.

Striking or Assaulting

Warrant officer: Category 2 — 1 to 36 months
Superior NCO or petty officer: Category 2 — 1 to 36 months
Other NCO or petty officer: Category 1 — 0 to 12 months

Willfully Disobeying a Lawful Order

Warrant officer: Category 1 — 0 to 12 months
NCO or petty officer: Category 1 — 0 to 12 months

Contempt or Disrespect

Warrant officer: Category 1 — 0 to 12 months
Superior NCO or petty officer: Category 1 — 0 to 12 months
Other NCO or petty officer: Category 1 — 0 to 12 months

How an Experienced Military Defense Attorney Helps

A military defense attorney can help by:

Challenging the lawfulness and scope of an order
Identifying whether the conduct in question amounts to insubordination
Attacking weak investigative foundations
Identifying biases and other credibility issues with accusers
Positioning your case for dismissal, withdrawal, or favorable resolution

For more on the boundaries of obedience and failure to obey, see Analyzing the Boundaries of Obedience: A Comprehensive Review of Article 92 Jurisprudence. For a guide to your rights as an accused service member, see The Military Accused: A Strategic Guide to Your Rights and Defense in 2026. For general court-martial context, see Court Martial Meaning: The High-Stakes Reality of Military Justice.

SPEAK TO A MILITARY DEFENSE LAWYER NOW